AI Workflow & Vibe Researching
| Presenter | Yiyang Jiang |
| Date | July 6, 2026 |
| Topic | AI Workflow & Vibe Researching |
The presentation argues that for modern physics research, the key question is no longer whether to use AI, but how to use it effectively. It distinguishes two major roles: NN-based AI for principles (neural-network fitting, neural quantum states, DeepH) and LLM-based AI for workflow (planning, memory, tools, APIs, MCP, agent loops).
Core AI concepts
The talk introduces foundational AI concepts relevant to research:
- LLMs, transformers, neural networks — the architecture stack
- Tokens & context windows — the currency and memory of LLM interactions
- RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) — grounding model responses in external knowledge
- Prompts & system prompts — how to instruct and constrain the model
- Tools, MCP (Model Context Protocol), APIs — connecting models to the world
- Agents & skills — composing capabilities into autonomous workflows
- Headless mode — running AI without a GUI for automation
Effective AI use depends on understanding how temporary context, saved memory, retrieval, and tooling interact.
Evolution of human–AI collaboration
| Year | Paradigm |
|---|---|
| 2023 | Chat-based assistance |
| 2024 | Coding assistants |
| 2025–2026 | Agentic AI workflows |
The workflow shifts from “user directly writes code” toward “user manages agents that work across a codebase and multiple tasks.”
Proposed research-project structure
A practical layout for AI-assisted research:
- Main workspace — global state and configuration
- Task folders — active execution environments
- Recycled / archive folders — failed or deprecated work
- Dashboard files (
main_dashboard.md,task_XX_dashboard.md) — track progress, results, and decisions - System prompts (
CLAUDE.md, setup prompts) — define project rules and workflow expectations
Core workflow principle
Break one difficult task into several easier steps.
LLM performance drops when a prompt is too broad or vague, but improves when tasks are decomposed and prompts are precise and concise. The research-coding spectrum runs from precise coding, to LLM workflow management, to vague prompting — the best results come from combining code-level precision with LLM-assisted iteration.
Toward further automation
Agents can implement tasks, check plans, evaluate results, run massive tests, and compare outputs. A possible research automation loop includes:
- Browse arXiv for new papers
- Grade and filter papers
- Share results through Discord
- Let the user approve plans and results before moving to the next task
Takeaway
“Vibe researching” is a structured approach to using LLMs as research workflow partners: organize memory, define prompts and rules, decompose tasks, use dashboards, test multiple agents, and keep the human in charge of judgment and approval.